Bloomberg
Joshua Levy, 05/10/2007 - 10:14am

The Web on the Candidates

Ben Smith has a biting piece in the Politico exploring YouTube, MySpace, and Facebook's growing role as arbiters of political speech. "As political communication moves online, a new group of corporate executives and their customer service agents have gained control of the censor's pen - in a forum where the First Amendment does not apply," Smith writes. YouTube in particular has attracted criticism from the left and the right for it's policy of removing "inappropriate" content. However, the expansiveness of the web means that other sites will pop to show content banned on the biggies. "A video posted on a small site might not access the giant communities of YouTube or MySpace, but political bloggers and campaigns could easily direct the members of their own communities to a video posted anywhere.

Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memo has been producing some great online video under the name TPM TV, producing videos that give his insistent investigative reporting more room to breath. He's been extending his coverage of the Alberto Gonzales controversy with new videos that quickly react to new developments, and his team produces great videos essays that pull together news coverage and commentary. While the actual content of the reporting isn't that different from Marshall's blog posts, it's refreshing to see him in front of the camera interacting with televised news reports or even interviewing people like John Kerry. We look forward to seeing how Marshall uses video to cover the presidential race.

| Read more ...
Syndicate content
Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.