No fingerprints blog smearing
By Jan Frel, 10/19/2005 - 6:38pm

Kos has a posting up about the nefarious tricks that pro-GOP bloggers in Virginia appear to be making to cloud the waters about Gov. Mark Warner's support of Tim Kaine, which the media outlets go on to cover:

From the National Journal Hotline:

When we saw this blog post asserting that VA Gov. Mark Warner was finished campaigning for candidate Tim Kaine, we did not make too much of it. After all Warner just on the campaign trail with Kainein NoVA on Monday and the two are slated to join forces again tomorrow in SW VA. But when some GOP officials started circulating the post to the media, we thought we'd check it out.

"Nothing could be further from the truth," says Warner political adviser Mame Reiley. She said that Warner is with Kaine "lock, stock and barrel" and that Warner had actually recently asked his staff to "carve out some more time" on his schedule so that he can spend more time with his preferred successor.

So why this rumor? Because GOPers are "petrified at [Warner's] impact on the race," says Reiley.

Kos, who picked up on this, writes:

"This is the tactic the GOP developed in the South Dakota senate race last year -- leak damaging information, irrespective of the truth, onto blogs. Then, GOP party and campaign officials circulated those blog posts to the media, demanding that they follow up on the allegations. Media, afraid of being called "liberal," wrote about the allegations.

"It's now clearly SOP, and Democratic campaigns need to become well versed in the blogosphere, see these attacks coming in advance, and be prepared to rebut them when necessary (as in, when reporters call asking for comment).

"And note, it's not that blogs are reporting rumors or making allegations -- it's that Republican operatives then push those blog posts on to the media. Even when they are patently and obviously false as claiming Warner is ditching the Kaine campaign even though his schedule is full of joint events."

Kos: still opposed to regulation?

In April, Kos wrote:
"Incidentally, I'm not a Feingold supporter for president. Anyone who attempts to regulate blogs -- like he has -- is instantly on my shit list"

Gee, if blog posts can maim Democratic candidates at will, ya think that he might warm his heart towards some attempt at regulation? Like a rewards & punishment system of sorts for sites which engage in these tactics? For example, a blog/forum can only seek a "press exemption" IF they don't allow pseudonymous posts? Well, that would end the press exemption of the DailyKOS.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.