Do Republicans Do Tech Better Than Dems?
By Kate Kaye, 06/13/2005 - 12:39pm

Conservative campaign strategy consultant and blog pundit Matt Lewis thinks so. In response to a recent column from Susan Estrich on RealClearPolitics, Lewis opines that the GOP knows how to apply technology more effectively than the left does. Estrich noted the Bush ’04 campaign’s “sophisticated technological project that allowed it to communicate with voters in key states and key groups the same way Amazon does with regular purchasers….”

In a post today to his blog, Lewis writes, “Democrats view technology as a game. They like to put a lot of effort into blogging and hope to be able to, ‘create an internet community.’ Republicans (who by nature are outcome-based and serious) tend to use technology (like micro-targeting) to identify, persuade, and turn-out voters on Election Day.”

Ouch.

I’m sure plenty of our readers from the left could list lots of instances that counter Lewis’ contention. Still, I wonder if there’s a bit of truth to this obviously generalized view, at least when considering our coverage of the inner technological workings of the DNC, as laid bare by contributing editor Brian Reich in his enlightening April PDF piece. In this PDF feature, Reich explains how far the Dems have to go in the tech department before they catch up with their rivals. If anything, the fact that the top-tier Democratic committees had been reluctant to let data trickle down to local-level organizations -- while Republicans had long been sharing information –- serves to support Lewis’ argument.

top-down v. bottom-up: revenge of the myth

Kate--
Wow, he opined in all of 328 words. 195 if you don't count where he quotes Estrich. Your post was longer than that.

Thanks for citing Brian Reich's piece, it's still good, and a lot of people are curious whether any of the problems have been followed up on.

Back in November, I put in a 1600-word analysis of the the two approaches, seeing them as the corporate/top-down approach associated with the GOP and the social/bottom-up approach. And I simply backed up statements Zephyr Teachout here and Zack Exley (elsewhere) that there was no point for progressives to be religious about shunning technology that appears to be "top-down".

That's not to say that the Amazon-like voter targeting is healthy for Democracy. Here's a quote I still admire from Jon Gertner's 2/15/04 NYT Mag article: "The candidate knows everything about the voter, but the media and the public know nothing about what the candidate really believes. It is, in effect, a nearly perfect perversion of the political process."

btw, the opening from Lewis's piece was rather telling:
"Recently, I attended a conference on the use of technology in politics. Or, in short, bloggers talking to bloggers about how great blogging is..."

Technology is a tool...

A Republican I know once said, "Republican candidates are more familiar with working in corporations, so love things like polling, because they have used it in business and understand the benefits; Democratic candidates are always more keen to spend time with the Media team, because they think it seems more interesting."

I think that is true about their use of technology. Look at how the two parties used it in 04 - the GOP were using it for micro-targeting and organising their volunteers; ACT were going round Ohio showing people videos on their PDAs. Which do we think was the more effective approach?

Technology, the Internet included, can make the basic campaign functions like volunteer coordination, fundraising, GOTV etc. more effective and more efficient - but it must enhance these functions, not replace them.

The Republicans seem to get that for 04, I am not sure the Democrats have even now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.

Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.