Schundler Image Big Foul for Big Fish
By Kate Kaye, 06/06/2005 - 11:14am

By now many of you fanatical Web gossip hounds have come across the story of a photo faux-pas involving NJ Republican Bret Schundler. It turns out a photo on the merch section of his primary campaign site had featured a photo that had been doctored by DC marketing company Big Fish. The image originally featured Howard Dean backed by a throng of supporters. The altered pic replaced Dean with Schundler and replaced Dean related paraphernalia -- a ballcap and poster -- with Schundler shtuff. PoliticsNJ.com has a comparison of the original and subsequent bastardization.

Honestly, I don't think this reflects poorly on Schundler at all as a candidate. I highly doubt he was involved with the decision making process for an image on his website, which he couldn't possibly have time for in the midst of a very contentious primary campaign. However, it's a big foul for Big Fish (or "big fowl" if you like puns). According to the firm's website, it created direct mail and other collateral for Republican and Democratic candidates and issue advocacy groups before the 2004 election (including Dean's primary campaign).

I'm not sure whether the image was used anywhere other than the one page on the site, but it's kinda obvious that the photo was doctored. If it was that necessary to have a photo of the candidate and his supporters, surely there was one or two floating around the campaign headquarters, no? If not and they just HAD to have that sort of image, there are plenty of places to find non-copyrighted images for free or purchase copyrighted images. I mean...hello...hadn't the Big Fish lackey who created the image heard of Photodisc? Of course, concocting images from found parts wouldn't be too kosher in this case either.

Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.