Do Email Silences Matter?
By Joshua Levy, 01/29/2007 - 6:55am

Karen Matheson and Eve Fox of M&R Strategic Services ask, "Are you one of the many email fundraisers, organizers, advocates or marketers who view their online statistics with a sigh? Do you fantasize about sky-high open, click-through, and response rates... a list with zero unsubscribes?"

If you fit the bill and need to figure out how to get your open rates up and your op-outs down, you should check out Matheson and Fox's new report titled "Do Email Silences Matter?" The crux of the report is that "on-again, off-again conversations" -- inconsistent email campaigns with long gaps in communication -- cause supporters to lose interest in campaigns.

According to M&R's study, conducted from November 2005 to October 2006 and following the email campaigning practices of four major nonprofit groups, click-through and response rates went slightly down after a one month gap in communication; after two to three months of no email communication those rates decreased even further.

Article Jan07 Advocacyrespo

The solution? To maintain a healthy relationship with your constituents, email them regularly! Matheson and Fox suggest maintaining a "comprehensive cross-departmental email communications schedule" that keeps diligent track of the date and content of email campaigns. You can see and example here.

Of course, this is kind of discovering the obvious, but it doesn't hurt to have hard numbers to prove what common sense suggests: the longer you take to get back to someone, the less likely they'll remember you.

The full report can be viewed on the web or as a PDF.


Tags:

Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.