Daily Digest: 10/3/07
By Joshua Levy, 10/03/2007 - 10:51am

The Web on the Candidates

  • Slate’s Christopher Beam and Chadwick Matlin take advantage of the “glories of Google suggest” to find popular search queries surrounding the candidates. The results are awesome. First off, and this comes as no surprise, more people are searching for the phrase “dennis kucinich wife” than “dennis kucinich for president.” Three of the top 10 searches for Rudy Giuliani are related to cross-dressing. This stuff is endless and completely addictive. I discovered that Mike Huckabee’s slimmer physique is responsible for “mike huckabee weight loss” (#2) being a more popular phrase than “mike huckabee fat” (#5). Congrats Mike!

  • It’s official: as we reported a couple of weeks ago, videoblogger James Kotecki has joined the Politico. He’s already begun producing a video “Playbook” and will be hitting the trail soon. Once again, an official congrats to James!

  • Are DailyKos’ highly-touted traffic numbers being inflated? TechPresident contributor Patrick Ruffini thinks so. After he was “frontpaged” on the site, Patrick expected his own traffic to rise accordingly. It didn’t. After investigating DailyKos’ Sitemeter stats, he discovered that the site’s stats may in fact be inflated. “But the reason is far from nefarious: a design flaw in how SiteMeter counts visits that systemically overcounts unique visitors on extremely high traffic blogs like Daily Kos… by a lot.” Check out the post for some in-depth sleuthing. If Patrick’s discoveries are correct, a lot of high-traffic sites are reporting inflated numbers.

  • After noting that some social conservatives are threatening to support a third-party candidate if Rudy Giuliani wins the Republican nomination, the Hotline’s Conn Carroll points out that “There is no voice in the blogosphere claiming to speak for the social conservative movement.” There are certainly established conservative voices online, Carroll says, but they all seem to be speaking about the group in the third-person; few are actually part of the movement. “Whatever divide exists between social conservatives and the GOP in real life, it has definitely materialized online as well,” Carroll writes.

  • Washington Post reporter Jose Antonio Vargas writes a profile of “a diverse, bipartisan group blog written, read and dissected by the who’s who of the growing online political digerati.” It’s called… techPresident! The piece features good quotes from site co-founders Andrew Rasiej and Micah Sifry, and is a good snapshot of the current techno-political moment. Also, check out the accompanying video that shows Andrew, Micah, and me sitting around Andrew’s kitchen table flexing our punditry muscles.

The Candidates on the Web

  • Blogger Leon Wolf has left the Sam Brownback campaign, reports Danny Glover. He’s just too busy: he’s in law school, he has a family, and he doesn’t live near the campaign. This is a tough break for the campaign, which has always struggled to have some semblance of an operational web presence. It doesn’t help that many spam-catching programs flag the word “Brownback” as porn.

  • The Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder picks up on something we at techPresident have long acknowledged: in addition to running a “near flawless” campaign, Chris Dodd has “used emerging technologies more fruitfully than just about everyone else.” Ambinder points to the campaign’s use of Ustream, live-blogging from the spin room, the “Talk Clock,” and other innovations as proof that, despite the lowest of poll numbers, Dodd’s web staff is far and way the most inventive and creative in the field.

  • In the middle of a major foreign policy speech, Barack Obama floated an idea that frames him as some sort of neo-FDR for the 21st century. “Mr. Obama said he would ask his national security officials to hold periodic national town hall meetings – via Web cast – to discuss foreign policy. And Mr. Obama would deliver ‘occasional fireside chats,’” reports the New York Times’ Jeff Zeleny. How cool would it be to watch, and interact with, the national security advisor’s weekly video chats? Or to set your Macbook by the fireplace and watch Obama’s digitized face as he updates us about the state of the nation?

  • John Edwards staffer Tracy Russo writes up some notes about Elizabeth Edwards’ recent meeting with bloggers from the Silicon Valley Moms blog and other sister sites. As an Edwards staffer, Russo isn’t going to report any negative comments from the bloggers, but mixed in with asides about dealing with loud children and rushing home from soccer games were comments in praise of the would-be first lady. “If we had the chance to ask Hillary or Barack or the others the same questions, would we get the level of thoughtfulness we got this afternoon?” asked one participant. “Meeting Elizabeth made me realize that if I vote for her husband, I have, for the very first time, a pretty good idea what I’m getting. And that made me rethink my assumptions about who and what I was really voting for,” said another. Read more at the blog itself, which gives links to the more than 20 blog posts spawned by the meeting and pleads with the other candidates, Democratic and Republican, to arrange a meeting with either the candidate or their spouse.

  • Josh Orton, the Deputy New Media Director responsible for Barack Obama’s blog outreach, has left the campaign. While Politico’s Ben Smith says it’s unclear why he left, maybe this is because of Obama’s lack of outreach to bloggers?

In Case You Missed It…

We just added a new chart to our stats arsenal, this one tracking Hitwise traffic stats. For historical information about the candidates' web traffic relative to each other, this is the place to go.

As attention to the Jena Six controversy fades in the blogosphere, Nancy Scola critiques political blogging’s obsession with “new” content, to the detriment of longer, more substantial inquiries into issues like Jena Six.

Mike Turk responds to criticism that Republican candidates have sent out email so badly formatted that Google Adwords can’t find ads for it. He doesn’t think that’s necessarily a bad thing. Things get heated in the comments: is it all Microsoft Word’s fault?

My post on stripped-down email continues to elicit reactions, with some commenters challenging the assertion that Chris Dodd was the first to send a message as if it was written on a BlackBerry.

Is it time for Americans to boycott voting?

Time to Boycott Voting

Joel S. Hirschhorn

After many years of political disappointment, more progressives, liberals and conservatives – and certainly moderates and independents – know in their hearts that voting for Democrats or Republicans is a waste. Just imagine if voter turnout was cut to 25 percent or less! Let the whole world see Americans boycotting a broken and corrupt political system and rejecting what has become a delusional democracy. To keep voting in an unjust political system makes us willing political slaves that the rich and powerful elites exploit.

Just leaving the major parties is not good enough and, besides, most Americans are not party members. We need a bolder strategy. We must humiliate the political elites in both major parties and the corporate interests that support both of them. We can send a shock wave throughout the political establishment by not voting in the 2008 presidential election.

Stop playing THEIR game. Take back control. Take back YOUR nation. Time to boycott voting. This strategy is consistent with the thinking of Gandhi and King: peaceful resistance to political tyranny that can bring the corrupt system to its knees. Ultimately, the most effective protest is through civil disobedience – to visibly and stubbornly refuse to respect what has become a corrupt, untrustworthy system. Before it can be fixed it must be deconstructed and then rebuilt. Taxation with MISrepresentation means we need a Second American Revolution; it must begin – not with violent action – but with massive withdrawal by citizens that have seen the light. We have a good head start with about half of eligible voters already so turned off that they don’t vote. Obviously that has not been sufficient to change the system.

There will be negative, defensive knee-jerk reactions to this audacious strategy. Let’s examine them:

Many will think that taking such action violates our responsibility as citizens. But taking that responsibility seriously as engaged citizens in the Jeffersonian sense must reflect that there is still a valid contract between citizens and their government. When we vote we have the right to a political system that respects we the people and gives us an authentic representative democracy. We have a right to a constitutional republic operating under the rule of law. But we have elected representatives that no longer have the public interest as their primary commitment, nor truly honor and respect our Constitution.

They have been corrupted by corporate and other special interests that fund their campaigns to get the laws, loopholes and largesse they want. They have been corrupted by power and the perks of office. They are political cowards and mostly intellectual midgets. The two major parties have a stranglehold on our political system that no longer merits our participation in their crooked game. Political parties are not part of our Constitution and the two-party duopoly has demonstrated that both Democrats and Republicans put their own interests above those of we the people, our nation and our democracy. We cannot vote our way out of our current, dreadful political system.

Whether you are on the political left or right, you will fear that not voting will help put in office people that support policies your abhor. But decades of objective political reality tell us that even people from the party that we align with do not, when elected, fulfill their promises and our hopes. Sadly, most Americans have become lesser-evil voters, deluding themselves that this is the best, least worse, yet awful choice. Instead of feeling bad about voting for candidates that we know in our hearts are not worthy of our votes and public office, we must have the courage to say “enough is enough; I will not play in this shameful game any longer.” We must stop legitimizing and abetting our disgraceful government.

Many may fear that not voting sets a terrible example to children. But isn’t it more important to tell America’s children that true patriotism must reveal itself by rejecting a political system that no longer merits respect? Thomas Jefferson believed in periodic rebellion. Now is the time for all good Americans to come to the rescue of their nation, peacefully by boycotting elections.

The small number of third party members may be screaming: yes, don’t vote for Democrats and Republicans; come over and join us! I have been a strong third party supporter, but we must face the painful truth. The two major parties have so rigged the political system in their favor and against third parties that voting for third party candidates for federal office is a futile action. We must first boycott voting to create sufficient pressure to open the system to genuine political competition. That requires a number of electoral reforms, possible if the nation gets its first Article V convention (see www.foavc.org). With reforms we can increase voter turnout to over 90 percent, as routinely seen in other democracies.

False patriotism may cause some to think that we must not show anti-American nations and terrorists that our government no longer has the trust of its citizens. But that has already been widely disseminated by endless polls and surveys, including the recent Zogby poll that found a record-low 11 percent support for Congress. Better to show our enemies that we the people have finally awakened and decided to re-assert our sovereignty and restore American democracy. Loyalty to country, yes; loyalty to government, no. Our populist American insurgency must begin with a boycott of voting.

Proof that this extraordinary strategy can work is that by now diehard Democrats and Republicans reading this are squirming in discomfort. So spread the word, if you have not deluded yourself about voting the nation into a far, far better place. Time to boycott voting. Join the picket line; admit that none of the above is the only rational decision when the choices the two major parties give us for federal officials are not worth a dime.

Voting in a delusional representative democracy is as harebrained as voting even though you know votes will not be honestly counted – which many fear may be true. We may have lost control of our government, but we still control our voting. Time to walk away from the brainwashing and fiction that it really matters which Democrat or Republican you vote for in primaries and general elections for federal office. Power elites want us to believe that. They collude with the corporate mainstream media that make tons of money from campaigns and want you to stay glued to suspenseful horse races. Loud-mouth political pundits that narrate the races are democracy’s enemies. We must stop watching and listening to the political entertainment designed to keep us obediently mesmerized, as if the game is honest. Without an audience, these phony races and media circus will disappear.

Don’t be fooled by the large number of candidates in the Democratic and Republican presidential primaries. It is a sham – a scheme to keep spectators glued to the illusory competition. Ron Paul has as much chance of being the Republican nominee as Dennis Kucinich has of being the Democratic nominee. With power elites controlling both major parties, zero chance for them and the other minor candidates, regardless of their grassroots support. Reflect on how both major parties accept lots of candidates in televised debates in the primary season. But come the general election with prime time televised presidential debates they keep out third party candidates that desperately need that exposure to rally meaningful support. Such is the hypocrisy and disdain of the two-party duopoly.

Come Election Day in 2008 we should party and celebrate (with TVs turned off) our populist boycott of voting and enjoy the camaraderie of fellow patriots. We must help them resist any late urge to vote, because by then millions of dollars will be spent by many special interests to make us feel guilty and ashamed if we do not vote. I can hear Paul Revere now: The liars are coming! The liars are coming! All that advertising and pundit-screaming to herd us back into the voting booths will verify that our boycott strategy works.

With having the votes of only a small minority of the electorate, whoever becomes president will have no public mandate except major, systemic political reforms that satisfy the will of the people. Either that or accept being the president of a fake democracy on the world scene.

Be brave. Stick together. Save voting for a reformed political system worthy of respect and participation.

[Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy – Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government that presents many electoral and other reforms; he can be contacted through www.delusionaldemocracy.com. Formerly, he was a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association.]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Technology and the Internet are changing democracy in America. Personal Democracy Forum is a hub for the exciting conversation underway between political professionals, technologists, and anyone else invigorated by the remarkable potential of technology to engage citizens in the democratic process.



Navigation

© 2008 Personal Democracy Forum | All Rights Reserved |
The layout, use of images, color, and other qualities.
How well is does the site carry the message of the candidate?
How the site discusses the issues and how it uses language.
How easy is it to get involved in the campaign?
How well does the site utitlize blogs, video, podcasts, discussion boards, and other technologies?
The ease of navigation and the quality of interactivtity.